The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters 初次接触Python

=============

由于自己对新知识的好奇,2014年被一位朋友吸引,当时遇到他时,他是在坚持用python进行实现自己的功能。同时用的是vim进行编写,而之前我一直是用
IDE
,2015年初,我开始了解python,首先我接触到的就是

    
import this

The Zen of Python

- **Python的原则**

Beautiful is better than ugly.

- **优美胜于丑陋(Python 以编写优美的代码为目标)**

Explicit is better than implicit.

- **明了胜于晦涩(优美的代码应当是明了的,命名规范,风格相似)**

Simple is better than complex.

- **简洁胜于复杂(优美的代码应当是简洁的,不要有复杂的内部实现)**

Complex is better than complicated.

- **复杂胜于凌乱(如果复杂不可避免,那代码间也不能有难懂的关系,要保持接口简洁)**

Flat is better than nested.

- **扁平胜于嵌套(优美的代码应当是扁平的,不能有太多的嵌套) **

Sparse is better than dense.

- **间隔胜于紧凑(优美的代码有适当的间隔,不要奢望一行代码解决问题)**

Readability counts.

- **可读性很重要(优美的代码是可读的)**

Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.

- **即便假借特例的实用性之名,也不可违背这些规则(这些规则至高无上)**

Although practicality beats purity.

Errors should never pass silently.

- **不要包容所有错误,除非你确定需要这样做(精准地捕获异常,不写 except:pass 风格的代码)**

Unless explicitly silenced.

- **而是尽量找一种,最好是唯一一种明显的解决方案(如果不确定,就用穷举法)**

In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.

- **当存在多种可能,不要尝试去猜测**

There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

- **而是尽量找一种,最好是唯一一种明显的解决方案(如果不确定,就用穷举法)**

Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.

- **虽然这并不容易,因为你不是 Python 之父(这里的 Dutch 是指 Guido )**

Now is better than never.

Although never is often better than *right* now.

- **做也许好过不做,但不假思索就动手还不如不做(动手之前要细思量) **

If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.

If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.

- **如果你无法向人描述你的方案,那肯定不是一个好方案;反之亦然(方案测评标准)**

Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!

- **命名空间是一种绝妙的理念,我们应当多加利用(倡导与号召)**



---- by Tim Peters


  • python 也用了一段时间,感觉他和javascript很像,但是只是感觉,具体哪里像,后面我会归档一下,同时也是为自己理清思路。
  • 她与java的区别,我目前感觉两种语言,只是语法上的不同,没有感觉到非常大的差别,我也会单独整理一份这两个语言的差别。但自己学习。